The Fall and Death

Greg Haslam

"Christian scientists like Dr Denis Alexander , Francis S. Collins and Davis A. Young persistently defend various forms of ‘theistic evolution’ as they seek to accommodate the claims of ‘old cosmos’ evolutionism within a biblical framework. Their atheistic colleagues deny the very existence of an infinite, personal creator God. But in spite of their differences, they are all in agreement concerning their assumptions that death, disease, birth defects, struggle, suffering, inordinate pain, carnivorous violence, bloodshed and destructive ecological disasters of every kind, were all prevalent on earth from its earliest beginnings. This is simply the way things are, have always been, and will continue to be. This is nature being true to itself and perhaps the way God designed the world, if God exists at all. However, the NT endorses the accuracy of Genesis directly and indirectly over 200 times, and cites Genesis 1 – 11 107 times."

Comments

#1 Death and the Fall — Ruth Campbell 2012-04-25 14:03

You object to the idea of death before the Fall. Paul speaks of the cross of Christ and the Fall of Adam as parallel events. We accept that the cross is an eternal event that acts both forwards and backwards in time. Why not the same for the Fall? Is it possible that Adam's fall happened both in time and eternity? Just as Christ is the Lamb that was slain from the creation of the world (Rev 13v8). Paul doesn't mention Eve's contribution, maybe she wasn't there for the eternal event. The Bible says, unless a seed falls into the ground and dies, it remains alone (John 12.24). Could this be about both Christ and Adam?

Refresh comments list
RSS feed for comments to this post.

Add comment

JComments

Foreword
^{Wayne Grudem}
Preface: A twenty-first century challenge
^{Phil Hills}
1. Evolution and the Church
^{Alistair Donald}
2. The language of Genesis
^{Alistair McKitterick}
3. Adam and Eve
^{Michael Reeves}
4. The fall and death
^{Greg Haslam}5. Creation, redemption and eschatology
^{David Anderson}6. The nature and character of God
^{Andrew Sibley}
7. Faith and creation
^{R. T. Kendall}
8. Towards a science worthy of creatures in imago Dei
^{Steve Fuller}
9. Interpretation of scientific evidence
A. Homology
^{Norman Nevin}B. The nature of the fossil record
^{Norman Nevin}
C. Chromosomal fusion and common ancestry
^{Geoff Barnard}
D. Information and thermodynamics
^{Andy McIntosh}
10. Does the genome provide evidence for common ancestry?
^{Geoff Barnard}11. The origin of life: scientists play dice
^{John Walton}Conclusion: Should Christians embrace evolution?
^{Phil Hills and Norman Nevin}

Infomation

Book Price: £9.99
Paperback 192 pages
ISBN 9781844744060
Published 20/11/2009

_{Edited by}
Norman C. Nevin
_{Foreword by}
Wayne Grudem

Latest Comments

Wayne Grudem's Foreword
Does Dr. Grudem's equation apply to other scientific theories besides evolution? For example, Christians will listen to a weather forecast that explains the weather in terms o... Read More
12.02.13 18:43
By James McAdams
Creation, Redemption and Escha...
Thank you for meeting and available very nice articles. Read More
22.05.12 10:04
By Sanghyun Park
The Fall and Death
You object to the idea of death before the Fall. Paul speaks of the cross of Christ and the Fall of Adam as parallel events. We accept that the cross is an eternal event that ... Read More
25.04.12 14:03
By Ruth Campbell
Wayne Grudem's Foreword
I agree that evolutionary thought poses challenges for fundamentalist Christian faith, but I disagree that this means it's not true. Any lay person who spends more than a few ... Read More
25.07.11 04:09
By Ryan McGoff
Wayne Grudem's Foreword
Actually, I think the equation works. The proper mathematical illustration is some say 2+2+0=4, but others say 2+2+God=4, therefore God=0. In your illustration, nobody thinks ... Read More
22.07.11 18:56
By Tim